The Impact of Analogy on Academic Achievements and Critical Thinking in Mathematics and Geography among 4th Graders

Authors

  • أ. د. عبد الواحد حميد الكبيسي
  • م. د. ياسر عبد الواحد الكبيسي

Keywords:

Mathematics, Geography, Critical Thinking, Analogy, 4th Graders, Academic Achievements

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to know the effectiveness of similar strategy in the
achievement and smart thinking towards mathematics and geography at the
fourth- grade students of literary stream. The sample consisted of 40 students
who were divided into two groups equally, the first is the experimental for
math and geography and the second is the control group. The first tool in the
search measures the achievement test and the second measures the habits
of mind. Appropriate statistical methods are used and their validity and
reliability are tested. The results of the research are:
1. no statistically significant differences at the level (0.05) between the
average achievement test scores posttest between the experimental group
and the control group and the experimental group.
2. no statistically significant differences at the level (0.05) between the mean
scores of the experimental group and the control group on the smart
thinking and the experimental group scale.

Downloads

Published

2017-05-08

How to Cite

الكبيسي أ. د. ع. ا. ح., & الكبيسي م. د. ي. ع. ا. (2017). The Impact of Analogy on Academic Achievements and Critical Thinking in Mathematics and Geography among 4th Graders. Journal of Al-Quds Open University for Educational & Psychological Research & Studies, 4(13). Retrieved from https://journals.qou.edu/index.php/nafsia/article/view/160

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 13 (2016): المجلد الرابع، ع(13)، رجب 1437ه/ نيسان 2016م

Section

searches

License

  1. The editorial board confirms its commitment to the intellectual property rights
  2. Researchers also have to commit to the intellectual property rights.
  3. The research copyrights and publication are owned by the Journal once the researcher is notified about the approval of the paper. The scientific materials published or approved for publishing in the Journal should not be republished unless a written acknowledgment is obtained by the Deanship of Scientific Research.
  4. Research papers should not be published or republished unless a written acknowledgement is obtained from the Deanship of Scientific Research.
  5. The researcher has the right to accredit the research to himself, and to place his name on all the copies, editions and volumes published.
  6. The author has the right to request the accreditation of the published papers to himself.

 

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.