Evaluating the Practices of the Academic Supervisor at Al-Quds Open University in their class meetings from the Viewpoint of their Students
Keywords:
practices, academic supervisors, class meetings, viewpoint, students, Al-Quds Open UniversityAbstract
The study aimed at involving the students of QOU in evaluating their
supervisors in respect of class meetings and determining the degree of commitment
of those supervisors to the best supervision practices. This has been
done through a questionnaire that consisted of 38 items distributed over 6
domains. The questionnaire was implemented on a sample of 1242 students
who were registered in the second semester of the academic year 2005/2006 in
the university centers and regions in the West Bank. The findings of the study
indicated that the whole questionnaire in addition to three domains had high
average, while the other three domains averages were low.
Regarding the variables, the findings showed that there were statistically
significant differences due to academic program variable at the level of meeting
execution domain. Statistical differences were found for all domains due
to the other three variables, except the domain of planning & preparation of
meeting at the studying level variable, the domain of interaction and relation
with students at the level of meetings attendance variable. In the light of
the above mentioned results of a set of recommendations were addressed to
supervisors a Abstract
nd university officialDownloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
- The editorial board confirms its commitment to the intellectual property rights
- Researchers also have to commit to the intellectual property rights.
- The research copyrights and publication are owned by the Journal once the researcher is notified about the approval of the paper. The scientific materials published or approved for publishing in the Journal should not be republished unless a written acknowledgment is obtained by the Deanship of Scientific Research.
- Research papers should not be published or republished unless a written acknowledgement is obtained from the Deanship of Scientific Research.
- The researcher has the right to accredit the research to himself, and to place his name on all the copies, editions and volumes published.
- The author has the right to request the accreditation of the published papers to himself.