Implementing e-learning Maturity Model at Al-Quds Open University in Palestine

Authors

  • Islam Younes Amro | اسلام يونس عمرو Al-Quds Open University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33977/0280-010-016-010

Keywords:

e-Learning, blended learning, e-Learning management, e-Learning maturity model.

Abstract

Al-Quds Open University (QOU) is one of the leading organizations in the Arab countries in the blended and open learning models. The University has proved its leading role over 30 years of serving Palestine through more than 120 thousand graduates from its programs. The University has played a leading role in Palestine in adapting the e-learning component of the blended model for 14 years. In this research, we worked on implementing the e-learning Maturity Model (eMM) on the electronic component of the blended learning of al-Quds Open University. All the dimensions of the e-learning Maturity Model were considered and visited, and it was found to be applicable in most of its aspects of e-learning at QOU. The dimensions provided by the eMM were covered in this research as delivery, planning management, and optimization. The process followed in dealing with the model aspects was conducted through the standard recommendations of the eMM. The research also discussed the methodology of conducting the eMM process, which depended on partitioning the questionnaire according to the stakeholders within the University. The stakeholders were considered in terms of their functional tasks within their organizational units. The participants then were questioned accordingly, considering the standard questionnaire points. Then the answers were reflected to form the case implantation for al-Quds Open University. Recommendations are made according to the organizational gaps found, and suggestions are made to catch up with the gaps reflected from the eMM. The model implantation reflected extreme organizational issues related to pedagogies, organizational units, documenting core course creations, implementation procedures, tutors, and student support. In addition, the University demonstrated a very reliable, mature e-learning infrastructure and technical capabilities. The main shortcomings were found in issues related to the need to establish stand-alone strategic planning for e-learning and the need to increase procedures documentation and workflows to exceed the core of e-learning processes to cover all aspects of e-learning.

Author Biography

Islam Younes Amro | اسلام يونس عمرو, Al-Quds Open University

References

References

Andersen Kim Viborg, & Zinner Henriksen (2006). E-government maturity models: Extension of the Layne and Lee model.Government Information Quarterly Volume 23, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 236-248

Blanco-Ramírez Gerardo . & Joseph Berger(2014). Rankings, accreditation, and the international quest for quality: Organizing an approach to value in higher education Quality Assurance in Education 22(1).

Casanova Diogo, & Linda Price,& Avery Barry (2018). Supporting Sustainable Policy and Practices for Online Learning Education. Book chapter: Climate Literacy and Innovations in Climate Change Education

Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin 1987, 39(7), 3-7

Dhir, S. K., Verma, D., Batta, M., & Mishra, D. (2017). E-Learning in Medical Education in India. Indian Pediatrics, 54(10), 871-877. doi: 10.1007/s13312-017-1154-7

Esteban Tocto-Cano, Sandro Paz Collado, & Javier Linkolk López-Gonzales, Josué E. Turpo-Chaparro.A Systematic Review of the Application of Maturity Models in Universities. the Journal of Innovations in Education and Teaching International 57(4):434-449

Hijazi Haneen , & Hammad Bashar , & Al-Khasawneh Ahmad (2019). Modelling and Implementation of Proactive Risk Management in e-Learning Projects: A Step Towards Enhancing Quality of e-Learning. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications 10(5):235-251

Ignacio José, & PALACIOS OSMA, & Diego Alexander, & GÓMEZ LÓPEZ (2021). Maturity Model for Virtual Education.niversidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas, Bogotá, Colombia Volume 2020, Article ID 228061, Journal of e-Learning and Higher Education, 11 pages

International Standards Association (ISO) ISO/IEC TS 33061:2021. www.iso.org

Iskandar George (2012). Exploring the Dimensions of E-learning Maturity Model. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET) 7(2)

Lacerda Thaísa C., & Christiane Gressevon Wangenheim (2018).Systematic literature review of usability capability/maturity models. Elsivir Computer Standards & Interfaces Volume 55, January 2018, Pages 95-105

Marshall Stephen (2007). RoE-Learning Maturity Model Process Descriptions. Ministry of Education New Zealand. Online resource: http://e-learning.geek.nz/eMM/publications.php

Marshall, Stephen. (2006). eMM Version Two Process Guide. Wellington: Victoria University of Wellington.

Marshall Stephen (2012). Improving the quality of e-learning: Lessons from the e-MM. February Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 28(1):65-78

Marshall Stephen (2016). Quality as sense-making. Quality in Higher Education Journal 22(3):1-15

Marshall, S. (2010). A quality framework for continuous improvement of e-Learning: The e-Learning Maturity Model. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education, 24(1), 143-166.

Mirzayi, Khalil and M. Sepahpanah. (2021). A Study of E-Learning Maturity in Higher Agricultural Education Using Artificial Neural Network0.Department of Entrepreneurship Development and Sustainable Rural Employment Studies. Jahad University, Hamedan, Iran.

Neuhauser Charlotte (2004). A maturity model: Does it provide a path for online course design?.Journal of Interactive Online Learning 3(1)

Oxford Dictionaries. 2021. “Maturity.” Accessed Septemper 6, 2021. https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/

Paulk M. C., B. Curtis, M. B. Chrissis, and C. V. Weber (1993). Capability maturity model, version 1.1. in IEEE Software, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 18-27, July 1993.

Rogério Rossi, & Pollyana Notargiacomo (2015). eQETIC: a Maturity Model for Online Education.Interdisciplinary Journal of e-Skills and Lifelong Learning 11:011-023

Santos-Neto João, & Costa Ana (2020).Enterprise maturity models: a systematic literature review. Enterprise Information Systems Journal. ISSN: 1751-7575 (Print) 1751-7583 (Online) Journal https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/teis20

Sherry, A. C. (2003). Quality and its measurement in distance education. In M. G. Moore & W. G. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of Distance Education (pp. 435-459). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

SPICE Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination 18th International Conference, SPICE 2018, Thessaloniki, Greece, October 9–10, 2018, Proceedings Editors

Tarhana Oktay, and Turetkenb, and Hajo A.Reijersc (2016)Business process maturity models: A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology Volume 75, July 2016, Pages 122-13

Downloads

Published

2022-01-10

How to Cite

اسلام يونس عمرو I. Y. A. |. (2022). Implementing e-learning Maturity Model at Al-Quds Open University in Palestine. Palestinian Journal for Open Learning & E-Learning, 1(16). https://doi.org/10.33977/0280-010-016-010