Identifying the Prevailing Cognitive Style used among Public Universities Students in the Northern Jordanian Region
Keywords:
cognitive style, field- dependent, field- independent, , JordanAbstract
This study aimed at investigating the cognitive style prevailing among
students of public universities in the Northern Jordanian Region. The
study sample consisted of 1189 male and female students who were chosen
randomly.
To achieve the objectives of this study, the researchers used Group
Embedded Figures Test- GEFT- (Witken et al.,1977) to measure the cognitive
style (field- dependent; field- independent) of the study population. The results
of the study were as follows:
1. The dominant cognitive style of the respondents was of the field- dependent
style, where the mean value amounted to (8.42) which is below the decisive
degree (9) .
2. There were no significant statistical differences in the means of students’
grades that are attributed to the variables of gender and year of study.
3. The averages of students’ grades showed significant differences attributed
to faculty variable in favor of students of science faculties.
4. There were significant differences in the means of students’ grades
attributed to the university variable in favor of students’ means at the
Jordanian University of Science and Technology.
5. The study revealed that there were differences in the means of students’
grades attributed to the academic achievement in favor of academic
achievement: good, very good and excellent.
6. There was significant statistical effect attributed to the variables of
the university, faculty and academic achievement, while there were
no significant statistical effects for the variables of gender and year of
study.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
- The editorial board confirms its commitment to the intellectual property rights
- Researchers also have to commit to the intellectual property rights.
- The research copyrights and publication are owned by the Journal once the researcher is notified about the approval of the paper. The scientific materials published or approved for publishing in the Journal should not be republished unless a written acknowledgment is obtained by the Deanship of Scientific Research.
- Research papers should not be published or republished unless a written acknowledgement is obtained from the Deanship of Scientific Research.
- The researcher has the right to accredit the research to himself, and to place his name on all the copies, editions and volumes published.
- The author has the right to request the accreditation of the published papers to himself.