Faculty’s Perceptions of Moodle (LMS) Training Program and its Impact on their Levels of E-learning Implementation: Qualitative Look
Keywords:
Learning Management System (LMS), Moodle, e-learning, Information and Communication Technology (ICT), Teaching and learning.Abstract
This qualitative study investigated the faculty members’ perceptions
of a Moodle LMS training program and the impact of this training on their
instructional practice at Zarqa Private University in Jordan. Data were
collected via interviews with 23 faculty members and document analysis for
samples of their teaching materials.
The results indicated that faculty members had different perspectives
toward the Moodle training according to their levels of technological expertise.
They considered the Moodle training as an effective strategy for providing
basic knowledge and skills about using technology. However, because of
time commitments, teaching styles, and individual levels of proficiency with
technology, a “one-size-fits-all” training program for faculty does not achieve
the desired outcomes.
As an alternative to the generic model of training, findings from the data
suggest that training activities such as one-on-one instruction, instructional
video tapes, hands-on workshops, and online training may better support
faculty’s implementation of Moodle tools in the teaching and learning
process.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
- The editorial board confirms its commitment to the intellectual property rights
- Researchers also have to commit to the intellectual property rights.
- The research copyrights and publication are owned by the Journal once the researcher is notified about the approval of the paper. The scientific materials published or approved for publishing in the Journal should not be republished unless a written acknowledgment is obtained by the Deanship of Scientific Research.
- Research papers should not be published or republished unless a written acknowledgement is obtained from the Deanship of Scientific Research.
- The researcher has the right to accredit the research to himself, and to place his name on all the copies, editions and volumes published.
- The author has the right to request the accreditation of the published papers to himself.