The inappropriateness of syntactic poetic piece of evidence in Al Anbaris Al Insaaf The issue of judging the most appropriate participants in arguments as a model
Keywords:
Albesrien, Al- insaf، Alkufiin Argumentation, Controversy, Item of Poetic Evidence and Poetic EvidenceAbstract
Those who are familiar with Arabic grammar find that poetic evidence has taken its place in citations whether to prove or refute a rule, and they are the basis for creating new rules and eventually they formed a basis for building new rules.
This might be risky since the poetic items of evidence in "Al Insaf", for example are not compatible with the poetic evidence argumentation standards. The study is significant as the researcher investigated the syntactic poetic items of evidence in the issue of “the statement for prior judges in argumentations" in "Al Insaf" and attempts to judge the poetic syntactic items of evidence by applying poetic evidence argumentation standards. Then justifying why some are not appropriate for argumentation whether in terms of ignorance of the addressee, the multiplicity of the attributive form (al- nisbah), the multiplicity of narration or other reasons. After investigation, it appeared that nine of the issue’s ten items of evidence couldn’t be invoked. There are other new standards that make the witness inappropriate. The researcher further recommends that the items of poetic evidence in "Al Insaf" should not be adopted, and that a comprehensive study of poetic items of evidence should be conducted in the books of poetic argumentation to show what is acceptableDownloads
Published
2018-05-22
How to Cite
الزيادات د. ط. إ. م. (2018). The inappropriateness of syntactic poetic piece of evidence in Al Anbaris Al Insaaf The issue of judging the most appropriate participants in arguments as a model. Journal of Al-Quds Open University for Humanities and Social Studies, 1(44). Retrieved from https://journals.qou.edu/index.php/jrresstudy/article/view/1860
Issue
Section
Research Papers
License
- The editorial board confirms its commitment to the intellectual property rights
- Researchers also have to commit to the intellectual property rights.
- The research copyrights and publication are owned by the Journal once the researcher is notified about the approval of the paper. The scientific materials published or approved for publishing in the Journal should not be republished unless a written acknowledgment is obtained by the Deanship of Scientific Research.
- Research papers should not be published or republished unless a written acknowledgement is obtained from the Deanship of Scientific Research.
- The researcher has the right to accredit the research to himself, and to place his name on all the copies, editions and volumes published.
- The author has the right to request the accreditation of the published papers to himself.