The inappropriateness of syntactic poetic piece of evidence in Al Anbaris Al Insaaf The issue of judging the most appropriate participants in arguments as a model

Abstract

Those who are familiar with Arabic grammar find that poetic evidence has taken its place in citations whether to prove or refute a rule, and they are the basis for creating new rules and eventually they formed a basis for building new rules.

This might be risky since the poetic items of evidence in "Al Insaf", for example are not compatible with the poetic evidence argumentation standards. The study is significant as the researcher investigated the syntactic poetic items of evidence in the issue of “the statement for prior judges in argumentations" in "Al Insaf" and attempts to judge the poetic syntactic items of evidence by applying poetic evidence argumentation standards. Then justifying why some are not appropriate for argumentation whether in terms of ignorance of the addressee, the multiplicity of the attributive form (al- nisbah), the multiplicity of narration or other reasons. After investigation, it appeared that nine of the issue’s ten items of evidence couldn’t be invoked. There are other new standards that make the witness inappropriate. The researcher further recommends that the items of poetic evidence in "Al Insaf" should not be adopted, and that a comprehensive study of poetic items of evidence should be conducted in the books of poetic argumentation to show what is acceptable