The Issue of the Narrators who Conveyed the Sayings of Imams and are being criticized by Alimam Althahabi in his book Almizn : without Mustanad (evidence)and without Hujja (argument) (A critical comparative Study)

Authors

  • د. رأفت منسي محمد نصار الجامعة الإسلامية

Keywords:

criticized, Iman Al Thahabi, the book Al Mizan, (Mustanad) evidence, (Hujja) argument, critical comparative study

Abstract

This study addresses the issue of the narrators who conveyed the sayings of religious men (Imams) and are being criticized by Alimam Althahabi in his book Almizn : without Mustanad (evidence)and without Hujja( argument) as he showed that their argument and evidence Is not authentic and clear. In this study I gave a brief introduction about ALimam ALthahabi. In addition to that I improvised in proving the wrong opinions from the true ones where I used the critical comparative study thus illustrating the evidence and argument of the narrator (seven narrators).

I have concluded this research by including the most important findings and recommendations

Author Biography

د. رأفت منسي محمد نصار, الجامعة الإسلامية

أستاذ مشارك

Published

2018-05-22

How to Cite

نصار د. ر. م. م. (2018). The Issue of the Narrators who Conveyed the Sayings of Imams and are being criticized by Alimam Althahabi in his book Almizn : without Mustanad (evidence)and without Hujja (argument) (A critical comparative Study). Journal of Al-Quds Open University for Humanities and Social Studies, 1(44). Retrieved from https://journals.qou.edu/index.php/jrresstudy/article/view/1871

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.