Scholars Varied Opinions about the Companionship of Zer Ben Hubaysh

Authors

  • د. عبد الرحمن عبد الناصر سيد سلطان جامعة الجوف

Keywords:

Scholars Varied Opinions, Companionship, Zer Ben Hubaysh, criticism, narrators, narrations, sahaba, companions

Abstract

The researcher examines and investigates during the study the validity of the companionship of one of the narrators of the Hadith of prophet Mohammed ( peace be upon him ). This narrator is Zer Ben Hubaysh Abu Maryem Alasdi from Alkufa. He is considered one of the narrators that scholars disagree among each other about his validity as a companion and narrator who conveyed stories about prophet Mohammed (peace be upon him ). This is why the research focused on scholars varied opinions about the companionship of Zer Ben Hubaysh. The researchers show through tracking and investigating conveyed narrations and stories that Zer Ben Hubaysh wasn't one of sahaba (companions of Prophet Mohammad). Moreover, The researcher applied the methods and standards of narration on Zer Ben Hubaysh, and accordingly his companionship is not valid. The study followed descriptive analytical approach. The result of the study shows that Zer Ben Hubaysh is not a companion. Moreover, the study recommends the creation of an encyclopedia about narrators who are controversial with an analysis of their narrations

Author Biography

د. عبد الرحمن عبد الناصر سيد سلطان, جامعة الجوف

أستاذ مساعد

Downloads

Published

2018-05-22

How to Cite

سيد سلطان د. ع. ا. ع. ا. (2018). Scholars Varied Opinions about the Companionship of Zer Ben Hubaysh. Journal of Al-Quds Open University for Humanities and Social Studies, 2(44). Retrieved from https://journals.qou.edu/index.php/jrresstudy/article/view/1890

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 44 (2018): العدد الرابع والأربعون، الجزء الثاني، رجب 1439هـ/آذار 2018م

Section

Research Papers

License

  1. The editorial board confirms its commitment to the intellectual property rights
  2. Researchers also have to commit to the intellectual property rights.
  3. The research copyrights and publication are owned by the Journal once the researcher is notified about the approval of the paper. The scientific materials published or approved for publishing in the Journal should not be republished unless a written acknowledgment is obtained by the Deanship of Scientific Research.
  4. Research papers should not be published or republished unless a written acknowledgement is obtained from the Deanship of Scientific Research.
  5. The researcher has the right to accredit the research to himself, and to place his name on all the copies, editions and volumes published.
  6. The author has the right to request the accreditation of the published papers to himself. 

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.