The Jurisprudential Impact of the Diverse Guidances on Diacritics Positioning in the Holy Quran’s Recitations

Abstract

This descriptive, analytical and inductive study aimed at explaining the jurisprudential effect of the multiple grammatical positions (case endings) of the Holy Quran recitations in two chapters and a conclusion. The first chapter contained the definition of the Arabic case system, guidance and recitation. On the other hand, the second chapter discussed the effect of difference case ending (harakat) in guiding the Quranic recitations in some verses of jurisprudential rulings. Finally, major findings were included in the conclusion. There is a strong relationship between syntax and interpretation of the verses of the Holy Quran. Accordingly, syntax has the last word of guiding and explaining the meanings and the interpretation of many verses. There are other findings of which that the difference and variety of syntax led to different and variant jurisprudential rulings such as the several opinions in explaining the jurisprudential ruling of (Umrah), washing feet in ablution and committing hunting by a pilgrim.