Comprehensive Institutional Self-Evaluation for the Performance of Universities as a Tool for Development and Quality Assurance

Authors

  • M SHAHIN

Keywords:

Comprehensive Institutional Self-Evaluation, the Performance of Universities, Development, Quality Assurance

Abstract

This paper concentrates on self-evaluation of educational institutions using

the basic theory of development and bringing University education upto-

date. The theory of evaluation has been changed from a secondary role

of the government towards Universities to a comprehensive basic one of an

educational operation.

If the comprehensive evaluation is important in general for an educational

institution, it is more important for Universities that follow the Distance

learning and Open Education, such as Al-Quds Open university. Applying

comprehensive evaluation leads to achieving goals for these Universities.

On the top of these goals are: raising the academic level and standard,

growing the level of innovation, linking all educational processes together,

and reaching a comfortable level of renovation and development for

the institution.

At the same time quality education will be guaranteed for both educational

products and educational services.

Downloads

Published

2017-05-28

How to Cite

SHAHIN, M. (2017). Comprehensive Institutional Self-Evaluation for the Performance of Universities as a Tool for Development and Quality Assurance. Journal of Al-Quds Open University for Humanities and Social Studies, (1). Retrieved from https://journals.qou.edu/index.php/jrresstudy/article/view/468

Issue

No. 1 (2002): العدد الأول- رمضان 1423ه/ تشرين أول 2002م

Section

Research Papers

License

  1. The editorial board confirms its commitment to the intellectual property rights
  2. Researchers also have to commit to the intellectual property rights.
  3. The research copyrights and publication are owned by the Journal once the researcher is notified about the approval of the paper. The scientific materials published or approved for publishing in the Journal should not be republished unless a written acknowledgment is obtained by the Deanship of Scientific Research.
  4. Research papers should not be published or republished unless a written acknowledgement is obtained from the Deanship of Scientific Research.
  5. The researcher has the right to accredit the research to himself, and to place his name on all the copies, editions and volumes published.
  6. The author has the right to request the accreditation of the published papers to himself. 

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.