Varied Quran Recitations and their Impact on the Opinions of Muslim Scholars
Keywords:
Varied Quran Recitations, Impact, Opinions, Muslim ScholarsAbstract
This study discusses the of varied Quranic recitations and their effect on
the opinions of Muslim jurists. The study begins with a brief forward
illustrating the following: the differences of opinions among jurists, definition
of recitations, established categories, status of anomalous recitations as
well as jurists‘ stances on espousing certain judicial rulings based on
some anomalous recitations.
The study covers eight controversial themes over which jurists differed
due to their respective understandings of the varied recitations: These
include: the obligation of washing up feet in ritual ablution, the permissibility
of (sexual) intercourse upon the end of the menstrual period but before
purification bathing, identification of (the) middle prayer, validity of making
up missed sawm (fasting) in consecutive order and the status of “sa‘ei“
“harrowing back and forth“ between Safa and Mrawa, etc.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
- The editorial board confirms its commitment to the intellectual property rights
- Researchers also have to commit to the intellectual property rights.
- The research copyrights and publication are owned by the Journal once the researcher is notified about the approval of the paper. The scientific materials published or approved for publishing in the Journal should not be republished unless a written acknowledgment is obtained by the Deanship of Scientific Research.
- Research papers should not be published or republished unless a written acknowledgement is obtained from the Deanship of Scientific Research.
- The researcher has the right to accredit the research to himself, and to place his name on all the copies, editions and volumes published.
- The author has the right to request the accreditation of the published papers to himself.
_2.png)
_.png)
_2.png)
_1.png)
_.png)
