The Disagreements between Ibn Bint Al- Shafi’s Fiqh and the Four Schools of Thought of Islam : Review and Comparison
Keywords:
Fiqh, Disagreements, Ibn Bint Al- Shafi’i, four Schools of Thought, Islam, Review, comparisonAbstract
This research is based on studying an important jurisprudential subject
entitled: «The Fiqh Disagreements of Ibn Bint Al- Shafi’i to the four Schools
of Thought of Islamic Jurisprudence- review and comparison», It consisted of
an introduction, preface, and three topics, The introduction was devoted to the
importance of the topic, objectives, limitations of the study, previous studies,
and research methodology and plan, The preface was dedicated to the life of
Ibn Bint Al- Shafi’i. The first topic discussed the jurisprudence disagreements
of Ibn Bint Al- Shafi’i in worship, the second to his disagreements personal
matters and the third to his fiqh disagreements in sanctions.
The research concluded with a set of results, notably: that Ibn Bint Al-
Shafi’i did not see the prayers that were missed without an excuse could be
made up and he also considered going from Safa to Marwah, and back to Safa
as one round. He also considered that the boy child through breastfeeding
becomes the son of the woman who breastfed him and not the son of her
husband, and that a quorum is not a requirement for the consideration of
punishment of theft. He was in these- and others- in disagreement to the four
schools of jurisprudence.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
- The editorial board confirms its commitment to the intellectual property rights
- Researchers also have to commit to the intellectual property rights.
- The research copyrights and publication are owned by the Journal once the researcher is notified about the approval of the paper. The scientific materials published or approved for publishing in the Journal should not be republished unless a written acknowledgment is obtained by the Deanship of Scientific Research.
- Research papers should not be published or republished unless a written acknowledgement is obtained from the Deanship of Scientific Research.
- The researcher has the right to accredit the research to himself, and to place his name on all the copies, editions and volumes published.
- The author has the right to request the accreditation of the published papers to himself.