The Significance of the Differences in the Levels of Reflective Thinking among 10th Grade Students in the Light of Mathematical Self- Efficacy
Keywords:
Significance of the Differences, the Levels of Reflective Thinking, 10th Grade Students, Mathematical Self- Efficacy,Abstract
The current study aims to investigate the significance of the differences
in the levels of reflective thinking among the tenth grade students in the light
of the mathematical self- efficacy. The two instruments of the study have been
applied to a sample that consisted of (333) male and female students. The
sample of students was selected by a cluster stratified method from the tenth
grade students in Hebron Directorate of Education.
The results of the study showed that the level of understanding had been
ranked the first with the highest mean, followed by the level of reflection, then
the critical reflection, and the last in order was the level of habitual action.
Results of the two- way analysis of variance revealed significant differences
(α ≤ 0.05) in the level of habitual action due to the variable of gender and for
the benefit of females, while there were no significant differences on the scale
as a whole and on the rest of the levels. Results showed statistically significant
differences on the scale as a whole and the levels of understanding, reflection,
and critical reflection due to the variable of mathematical self- efficacy for
the benefit of the highly efficient category. Meanwhile the differences were
not significant on the level of habitual action. Finally, statistically significant
differences on the scale as a whole and level of critical reflection were
present.
These were attributable to the interaction between gender and
mathematical self- efficacy, while differences were not significant on the rest
of the levels.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
- The editorial board confirms its commitment to the intellectual property rights
- Researchers also have to commit to the intellectual property rights.
- The research copyrights and publication are owned by the Journal once the researcher is notified about the approval of the paper. The scientific materials published or approved for publishing in the Journal should not be republished unless a written acknowledgment is obtained by the Deanship of Scientific Research.
- Research papers should not be published or republished unless a written acknowledgement is obtained from the Deanship of Scientific Research.
- The researcher has the right to accredit the research to himself, and to place his name on all the copies, editions and volumes published.
- The author has the right to request the accreditation of the published papers to himself.